Quantum Computing in Drug Discovery: A Comparative Analysis of Classical, Quantum, and Hybrid Approaches

  • Saniya Paul R Department of Data Science, Sri Krishna Adithya College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore 641042, India
  • Sheeja S Department of Data Science, Sri Krishna Adithya College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore 641042, India
Keywords: Quantum Computing, Drug Discovery

Abstract

Drug discovery is a complex, costly, and data-intensive process that depends increasingly on computational methods for molecular modelling, virtual screening, property prediction, and lead optimisation. Classical high-performance computing, molecular simulation, and machine-learning methods currently provide the practical foundation for computer-aided drug discovery; however, their accuracy and scalability can be constrained when electronic correlation, large conformational spaces, or combinatorial optimisation must be treated explicitly. Quantum computing offers an alternative computational paradigm in which molecular electronic states and selected optimisation problems may be represented more naturally. This narrative comparative review examines the respective roles of classical, quantum, and hybrid classical-quantum approaches across major drug-discovery tasks. The analysis considers computational accuracy, scalability, hardware maturity, data requirements, interpretability, workflow integration, and evidence of practical utility. Current evidence indicates that classical methods remain superior for routine high-throughput screening and production-scale modelling, whereas quantum methods are presently restricted mainly to small molecular systems, proof-of-concept studies, and carefully selected subproblems. Variational quantum eigensolvers, quantum machine-learning models, and hybrid optimisation workflows are promising, but their performance remains sensitive to noise, circuit depth, data encoding, active-space selection, and benchmark design. The most credible near-term pathway is therefore not wholesale replacement of classical computing, but targeted integration of quantum routines into validated classical pipelines. Progress toward pharmaceutical utility will require chemically meaningful benchmarks, fair comparisons against strong classical baselines, uncertainty reporting, reproducible software stacks, and experimental validation of quantum-generated candidates.

References

D. Paul, G. Sanap, S. Shenoy, D. Kalyane, K. Kalia, R.K. Tekade, (2021) Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Drug Discovery Today, 26(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2020.10.010

G. Sliwoski, S. Kothiwale, J. Meiler, E.W. Lowe, (2014) Computational methods in drug discovery. Pharmacological Reviews, 66(1), 334–395. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.007336

S. A. Hollingsworth, R. O. Dror, (2018) Molecular dynamics simulation for all. Neuron, 99(6), 1129–1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.011

Y. Cao, J. Romero, J.P. Olson, M. Degroote, P.D. Johnson, M. Kieferová, I.D. Kivlichan, T. Menke, B. Peropadre, N.P.D. Sawaya, S. Sim, (2019) Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing. Chemical Reviews, 119(19), 10856–10915. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00803

S. McArdle, S. Endo, A. Aspuru-Guzik, S. C. Benjamin, X. Yuan, (2020) Quantum computational chemistry. Reviews of Modern Physics, 92(1), 015003. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.92.015003

J. Preskill, (2018) Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2, 79. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79

N. S. Blunt, J. Camps, O. Crawford, R. Izsák, S. Leontica, A. Mirani, A.E. Moylett, S.A. Scivier, C. Sunderhauf, P. Schopf, J.M. Taylor, N. Holzmann, (2022) Perspective on the current state-of-the-art of quantum computing for drug discovery applications. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 18(12), 7001–7023. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00574

A. Pyrkov, A. Aliper, D. Bezrukov, Y.C. Lin, D. Polykovskiy, P. Kamya, F. Ren, A. Zhavoronkov, (2023) Quantum computing for near-term applications in generative chemistry and drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today, 28(8), 103675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103675

W. Li, Z. Yin, X. Li, D. Ma, S. Yi, Z. Zhang, C. Zou, K. Bu, M. Dai, J. Yue, Y. Chen, (2024) A hybrid quantum computing pipeline for real world drug discovery. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 16942. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67897-8

A. M. Smaldone, Y. Shee, G. W. Kyro, C. Xu, N.P. Vu, R. Dutta, M. H. Farag, A. Galda, S. Kumar, E. Kyoseva, and V. S. Batista, (2025) Quantum machine learning in drug discovery: Applications in academia and pharmaceutical industries. Chemical Reviews, 125(12), 5436–5460. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00678

J. Biamonte, P. Wittek, N. Pancotti, P. Rebentrost, N. Wiebe, S. Lloyd, (2017) Quantum machine learning. Nature, 549(7671), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23474

A. Aspuru-Guzik, A.D. Dutoi, P.J.Love, M. Head-Gordon, (2005) Simulated quantum computation of molecular energies. Science, 309(5741), 1704–1707. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1113479

A. Peruzzo, J. McClean, P. Shadbolt, M.H. Yung, X.Q. Zhou, P.J.Love, A. Aspuru-Guzik, J.L. O’Brien, (2014) A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor. Nature Communications, 5(1), 4213. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5213

A. Kandala, A. Mezzacapo, K. Temme, M. Takita, M. Brink, J.M. Chow, J.M. Gambetta, (2017) Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets. Nature, 549(7671), 242–246. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23879

M. Ghazi Vakili, C. Gorgulla, J. Snider, A. Nigam, D. Bezrukov, D. Varoli, A. Aliper, D. Polykovsky, K. M. Padmanabha Das, H. Cox III, A. Lyakisheva, A. H. Mansob, Z. Yao, L. Bitar, D. Tahoulas, D. Čerina, E. Radchenko, X. Ding, J. Liu, F. Meng, F. Ren, Y. Cao, I. Stagljar, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and A. Zhavoronkov, (2025) Quantum-computing-enhanced algorithm unveils potential KRAS inhibitors. Nature Biotechnology, 43(12), 1954–1959. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02526-3

Published
2026-05-11
How to Cite
R, S. P., & S, S. (2026). Quantum Computing in Drug Discovery: A Comparative Analysis of Classical, Quantum, and Hybrid Approaches. International Journal of Computer Communication and Informatics, 8(1), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.34256/ijcci2615



Views: Abstract : 5 | PDF : 1

Plum Analytics