Experimental Evaluation of Sisal-Fibre-Reinforced Concrete Utility Blocks Containing Crushed Ceramic Tile as Fine Aggregate
Abstract
This experimental study evaluates concrete utility blocks incorporating crushed ceramic tile as a partial replacement for fine aggregate and alkali-treated sisal fibre as reinforcement. Crushed tile replaced fine aggregate at 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% by mass. After identifying the best-performing tile replacement, sisal fibre was added at 1.0%, 1.5%, and 2.0% by mass of cement. Workability was assessed by the slump test, and compressive strength was measured after 7, 14, and 21 days of water curing. Slump decreased from 130 mm for the control mixture to 45 mm at 40% tile replacement and decreased further with increasing fibre content, confirming reduced workability. Among the tile-modified mixtures, the 30% replacement mixture produced the highest compressive strengths of 27.476, 30.298, and 31.156 MPa at 7, 14, and 21 days, respectively. When sisal fibre was incorporated into the 30% tile mixture, the 1.5% fibre dosage provided the highest reported strengths of 35.560, 41.223, and 44.184 MPa. A further increase to 2.0% fibre reduced strength, indicating an optimum within the investigated range. The findings support the technical feasibility of combining crushed ceramic fines and treated sisal fibre in non-structural concrete utility blocks. However, the study is limited to workability and compressive strength; durability, water absorption, dimensional stability, tensile performance, and full-scale paving-block compliance require additional testing before practical deployment.
Downloads
References
Meena, R.V., Jain, J.K., Chouhan, H.S., Beniwal, A.S. (2022). Use of waste ceramics to produce sustainable concrete: A review. Cleaner Materials, 4, 100085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2022.100085
Meena, R.V., Jain, J.K., Beniwal, A.S., Chouhan, H.S. (2022). Sustainable self-compacting concrete containing waste ceramic tile aggregates: Fresh, mechanical, durability, and microstructural properties. Journal of Building Engineering, 57, 104941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104941
Tavakolia, D., Heidari, A. (2013). Properties of concretes produced with waste ceramic tile aggregate. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) 4(3), (2013) 369-382.
Tawfeeq, W.M. (2017) Replacement Effect of Coarse Aggregate by Crushed Tiles on Hardened Concrete Performance. International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Management Research, 2(1), 131-139.
Tang, L., Liu, T., Sun, P., Wang, Y., & Liu, G. Sisal fiber modified construction waste recycled brick as building material: Properties, performance and applications. Structures, 46, (2022) 927-935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.10.126
Adamu, M., Alanazi, F., Ibrahim, Y.E., Alanazi, H., Khed, V.C. (2022). A comprehensive review on sustainable natural fiber in cementitious composites: the date palm fiber case. Sustainability, 14(11), 6691. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116691
Lilargem Rocha, D., Tambara Júnior, L.U.D., Marvila, M.T., Pereira, E.C., Souza, D., & de Azevedo, A. R. G. (2022). A review of the use of natural fibers in cement composites: concepts, applications and Brazilian history. Polymers, 14(10), 2043. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14102043
Acosta-Calderon, S., Gordillo-Silva, P., García-Troncoso, N., Bompa, D.V., Flores-Rada, J. (2022). Comparative evaluation of sisal and polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete properties. Fibers, 10(4), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib10040031
Thepruttana, S., Patthanavarit, J., Hankoy, M., Kitiwan, M., Keawprak, N., Tunthawiroon, P. (2024). Enhancement of flexural strength in fiber–cement composites through modification of sisal fiber with natural rubber latex and expanded perlite. Buildings, 14(4), 1067. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14041067
Lv, C., Liu, J. (2023). Alkaline degradation of plant fiber reinforcements in geopolymer: a review. Molecules, 28(4), 1868. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041868
Bureau of Indian Standard, IS 456:2000, (2000). Plain and Reinforced Concrete—Code of Practice, New Delhi, India.
Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 10262:2019, (2019) Concrete Mix Proportioning—Guidelines, New Delhi, India.
Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 383:2016, (2016) Coarse and Fine Aggregate for Concrete—Specification, New Delhi, India.
Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 1489 (Part 1):2015, (2015) Portland Pozzolana Cement—Specification, New Delhi, India.
Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 15658:2021, (2021) Precast Concrete Blocks for Paving—Specification, New Delhi, India.
Copyright (c) 2026 Rahul R, Andavar P

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Views: Abstract : 4 | PDF : 5
Plum Analytics


.png)
.png)
.png)


.png)